The Shape of Things to Come
By Vin Suprynowicz
[email protected]
    
Special to The Libertarian Enterprise
         It is to forestall any misguided souls (however dear to my heart) 
from racing out and buying the book based on my "recommendation," 
that I must report -- even at the risk of appearing gratuitously 
unkind -- that a book that recently landed on my desk is not, really, 
very good.
         There is a certain variety of "action" or "speculative war" 
paperbacks which seem to be designed to be purchased by male readers 
in airports. The slightly better ones can result in diverting films 
starring Harrison Ford, while the rest can be downright cheesy, 
concentrating on the realistic depiction of various exotic weapons 
systems over such hidebound conventions as "character development."
         I have nothing against Ian Slater, an Aussie who apparently 
teaches political science at the University of British Columbia. I 
just felt obliged to make it clear that his latest paperback from 
Ballantine/Fawcett, "Showdown: USA vs. Militia" is to literature, 
more or less, what the works of Chuck Norris are to serious film.
         To be politically acceptable, for instance, books which portray 
the militia movement in the United States today are apparently 
expected to include prominently in the ranks of such groups both 
clueless, neo-Nazi skinheads and brain-damaged psychopaths. So Mr. 
Slater gives us one of each, constructed with all the care of a 
harried seamstress on a deadline, recycling last year's Halloween 
costumes by hurriedly basting on a few new ribbons and bows.
         But, that said, Ms. Slater is a very smart military analyst, 
making it easy for me to believe that he was, as advertised, once 
employed by the Australian Joint Intelligence Bureau.
         I recall that, in the 1920s, an equally unprepossessing "
potboiler" novel surfaced in this country, speculating that America 
would be catapulted into the second world war by a sneaky naval 
attack on the Hawaiian Islands.
         While this novel quickly passed into obscurity on these shores,
apparently some copies remained in dog-eared circulation for years
thereafter ... among officers of the Japanese Navy.
         Mr. Slater's insight is similarly visionary.
         He projects that the most likely geographic unit to break away 
from the government in Washington City -- over such issues as 
firearm rights, and the excessive and arbitrary federal 
strangulation of such productive enterprises as logging, mining, 
fishing and ranching -- would consist of the states of Montana, 
Idaho, Washington and Oregon, along with that part of California 
north of San Francisco.
         He projects that the main federal drive to reconquer this 
breakaway region would be north through California. But a look at 
the map then informs him that the most significant battle is 
actually likely to be fought by a haphazard assemblage of local 
militia irregulars, resisting a federal airborne (or, I would add, 
amphibious) landing intended to break the rebel supply lines by 
seizing the vital crossings of the Columbia River at Astoria and 
Portland.
         This may someday be deemed prophetic.
         Of course, Mr. Slater than insists on depicting a war fought 
largely along conventional, "Desert Storm" lines, whereas even as 
"establishment" a figure as George Washington was smart enough to 
hold his small, ill-trained force back -- for years --  from any 
single, decisive clash in ranks.
         Also striking in their omission are the economic factor of the 
huge but still "contraband" Northern California marijuana crop, and 
the single coup most likely to give any such secession a chance at 
achieving a strategic "Mexican standoff" -- the capture of the 
Pacific nuclear submarine fleet, intact, in port near Seattle.
         But most intriguing, after all, is the fact that such a civil 
war can now be contemplated, with even a passing swipe at a 
sympathetic analysis of the potential motives of the rebels, at the 
end of their ropes with a distant, arrogant Washington government 
that places the welfare of owls and salamanders over the ability of 
proud men to feed their families.
         How interesting.
#  #  #
         My followup early-April column, explaining why I think America's
Progressives opened the Pandora's Box of our current welfare-police 
state in the crucial period 1912-1919, brought two addenda.
         Novelist L. Neil Smith, whose sequel to "Henry Martyn" ... 
"Bretta Martyn," is due in better bookstores in August, writes from 
Colorado:
   
   
    "Vin -- You forgot the 1913 Federal Reserve Act, arranged at the 
    infamous Jekyll Island meeting (some say 'conspiracy.')  When I 
    was looking for the pivotal event around which to drape 'The 
    Probability Broach,' several people suggested changing history by 
    having somebody drop a biplane load of dynamite on that meeting 
    -- Neil."
    
    
         From Phoenix, long-time Libertarian political strategist George 
O'Brien added:
   
   
    "Dear Vin,
    
    "Another point about 1912 and Wilson: WWI brought the first 
    vestiges of central economic planning (what is now called 
    'industrial policy') to America.
    
    "In the short 18 months the U.S. was in the war, the federal 
    government forced all the railroads to operate as if they were 
    one big railroad. Competition between industrial firms was 
    limited if not eliminated and there were huge subsidies to 
    specified businesses.
    
    "This program of cartel mercantilism was far more extensive than 
    anything the U.S. had ever seen before. All of a sudden, the big 
    businesses that were being ravaged by competition could relax. 
    Their tiny competitors were crushed for the sake of efficiency 
    and their profits guaranteed.
    
    "Harding's 'normalcy' was a big letdown to the business leaders 
    who imagined they had found heaven. All that was needed to bring 
    back the heady days of WWI was another crisis and they could 
    expand industrial policy anew. In October of 1929, they got their 
    chance."
    
    
         Thanks for the help, chums. It turns out I knew more than I could 
even remember!
Vin Suprynowicz is the assistant editorial page editor of the Las 
Vegas Review-Journal. The web site for the Suprynowicz column is at 
http://www.nguworld.com/vindex/. The column is syndicated in the 
United States and Canada via Mountain Media Syndications, P.O. Box 
4422, Las Vegas Nev. 89127.