| TH
 E
LI
 B
 E
 R
 T
 A
 R
 I
 A
 N
 EN
 T
 E
 R
 P
 R
 I
 S
 E
 I
 s
 s
 u
 e
  34
 | L. Neil Smith's
 THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE
 Number 34, December 25, 1997
 
 
 
[Editor's note: for sending us the following, we thank Yael Dragwyla, 
Dale Seago, Edgar Suter, and Dr. Paul himself, who has also introduced 
legislation to surgically remove the UN from America's jugular vein.]
 A Federal Police Force Is Unconstitutional
A Speech by Rep. Ron Paul 
(R-TX), House of Representatives
 
Special to The Libertarian Enterprise
 
September 17, 1997
 
         Mr. Speaker, earlier this year, another Member severely criticized 
me on the House floor for declaring on C-SPAN that indeed many 
Americans justifiably feared their own government.  This fear has come 
from the police state mentality that prompted Ruby Ridge, Waco and 
many other episodes of an errant Federal Government.
Under the constitution, there was never meant to be a Federal 
police force.  Even an FBI limited only to investigations was not 
accepted until this century.  Yet today, fueled by the Federal 
Government's misdirected war on drugs, radical environmentalism, and 
the aggressive behavior of the nanny state, we have witnessed the 
massive buildup of a virtual army of armed regulators prowling the 
States where they have no legal authority.  The sacrifice of 
individual responsibility and the concept of local government by the 
majority of American citizens has permitted the army of bureaucrats to 
thrive.
 We have depended on government for so much for so long that we as 
people have become less vigilant of our liberties.  As long as the 
government provides largesse for the majority, the special interest 
lobbyists will succeed in continuing the redistribution of welfare 
programs that occupies most of Congress's legislative time.
 Wealth is limited, yet demands are unlimited.  A welfare system 
inevitably diminishes production and shrinks the economic pie.  As 
this occurs, anger among the competing special interests grows.  While 
Congress and the people concentrate on material welfare and its equal 
redistribution, the principals of liberty are ignored, and freedom is 
undermined.
 More immediate, the enforcement of the interventionist state 
requires a growing army of bureaucrats.  Since groups demanding 
special favors from the Federal Government must abuse the rights and 
property of those who produce wealth and cherish liberty, real 
resentment is directed at the agents who come to eat out our 
substance.  The natural consequence is for the intruders to arm 
themselves to protect against angry victims of government intrusion.
 Thanks to a recent article by Joseph Farah, director of the 
Western Journalism Center of Sacramento, CA, appearing in the Houston 
Chronicle, the surge in the number of armed Federal bureaucrats has 
been brought to our attention.  Farah points out that in 1996 alone, 
at least 2,439 new Federal cops were authorized to carry 
firearms.  That takes the total up to nearly 60,000.  Farah points out 
that these cops were not only in agencies like the FBI, but include 
the EPA, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, and the Army Corps of 
Engineers.  Even Bruce Babbitt, according to Farah, wants to arm the 
Bureau of Land Management.  Farah logically asks, 'When will the NEA 
have its armed art cops?'  This is a dangerous trend.
 It is ironic that the proliferation of guns in the hands of the 
bureaucrats is pushed by the antigun fanatics who hate the second 
amendment and would disarm every law-abiding American citizen.  Yes, 
we need gun control.  We need to disarm our bureaucrats, then abolish 
the agencies.  If government bureaucrats like guns that much, let them 
seek work with the NRA.
 Force and intimidation are the tools of tyrants.  Intimidation 
with government guns, the threat of imprisonment, and the fear of 
harassment by government agents puts fear into the hearts of millions 
of Americans.  Four days after Paula Jones refused a settlement in her 
celebrated suit, she received notice that she and her husband would be 
audited for 1995 taxes.  Since 1994 is the current audit year for the 
IRS, the administration's denial that the audit is related to the suit 
is suspect, to say the least.
 Even if it is coincidental, do not try to convince the American 
people.  Most Americans, justifiably cynical and untrusting toward the 
Federal Government, know the evidence exists that since the 1970's 
both Republican and Democratic administrations have not hesitated to 
intimidate their political enemies with IRS audits and regulatory 
harassment.
 Even though the average IRS agent does not carry a gun, the threat 
of incarceration and seizure of property is backed up by many guns.   
All government power is ultimately gun power and serves the interests 
of those who despise or do not comprehend the principles of liberty.   
The gun in the hands of law-abiding citizens serves to hold in check 
arrogant and aggressive government.  Guns in the hands of the 
bureaucrats do the opposite.  The founders of this country fully 
understood this fact.
 Published in the Sep. 22, 1997 issue of The Washington Weekly 
Copyright © 1997 The Washington Weekly (http://www.federal.com) 
Reposting permitted with this message intact.
 
 
 
It is moral weakness, rather than villainy,  that accounts for most of 
the evil in the universe -- and feeble-hearted allies, far rather than 
your most powerful enemies,  who are likeliest to do you an injury you 
cannot recover from. 
-- Bretta Martyn (http://www.lneilsmith.org//lnsbooks.html)
 
 
 
 Next 
to advance to the next article, or  Previous 
to return to the previous article, or  Index 
to return to The Libertarian Enterprise, Number 34, December 25, 1997. 
 |