The Redneck Manifesto
By Jim Goad
Simon and Schuster, 1997, 274 pages
Reviewed by Charles Curley 
[email protected]
Special to The Libertarian Enterprise
          Have some chapter titles:  "White Niggers Have Feelings, Too", 
"Feudal Existence:  The Roots of Eurogarbage", "Me and the Blacks", 
"Several Compelling Arguments for the Enslavement of All White 
Liberals", and my personal favorite chapter title, "What's So Bad 
About Hatemongers, Gun Nuts, and Paranoid, Tax-Resisting Extremists?" 
It goes on from there.
          This book is an in-your-face look at modern liberals that examines 
what they won't examine:  their own hypocracies and follies.  Don't 
get me wrong, Goad sees conservatives as almost the same.  "Liberals 
and conservatives are two ass cheeks surrounding the same hairy 
bunghole."
          That and other libertarian insights show up here.
          Goad does not like the government. After a page an a half of 
U.S. federal government lies and atrocities (without once mentioning 
Waco, Ruby Ridge or Oklahoma City), Goad tosses in this little 
insight:  "Maybe we wouldn't be so FUCKING PARANOID if they hadn't 
FUCKING LIED to us so many times.  Just a thought."  Can you figure 
that out, Morris Dees?  Or are you too busy counting up the profits 
from white liberal guilt?
          (All the emphasis in the text is in UPPER CASE, as though Goad 
can't afford a modern word processing package and Simon and Schuster 
won't pay for a typesetter who can translate it into italics.  Or 
maybe someone at Simon and Schuster thought that delicate fonts like 
italics shouldn't be wasted on semi-literate rednecks.)
          Here's one you won't see in NRA literature:  "Getting desperate, 
the gun controllers will drag out the phallic-compensation explanation 
.... But the penis can point both ways.  Why is the government, which 
owns many more dick-shaped weapons than the militias, rarely accused 
of having a weiner hangup too?  Isn't it just feasible that pentagon 
officers are practicing phallic compensation, too?"
          The most annoying thing about this book is that for years I have 
been screening out all the discussion of black helicopters on the net. 
Loony tunes, I thought.  So I have to read the rant of a white male 
living in a redneck ghetto of Portland, Oregon, to learn that black 
helicopters are real, after all, "you fruitcake .... The ebony 
choppers' stated purpose is 'low flying country surveillance.'  Maybe 
instead of swallowing whatever the 'experts' say, more Americans 
should be asking why the government wants to watch over us in the 
sky."
          And the bibliography includes authors of interest to libertarians 
such as Edward Abbey, Gary Allen, Al Capp, Frederick Douglass, Viktor 
Frankl, Michael Hoy, John McManus, Ron Paul, Henri Prienne, Thomas P. 
Slaughter and Lysander Spooner.  And most liberals don't think a 
redneck can read a 5 1/2 page bibliography, never mind assemble one.
          Not that Goad is a libertarian.  His understanding of the 
economics of labor and labor-management relations are straight out of 
Karl Marx.  Since Marx was in the top two percent of incomes in 
England, Marx, like liberals, might have not really understood the 
working class all that well, hmmm, Jim, boy?
          He also does a lot of class analysis, in which only a few 
libertarians engage.  The thesis starts out in medieval Europe, with 
its ruling class and serfs.  It gets more trenchant and further from 
liberal mythology in its analysis of indentured servitude.  Try this 
on for size:  "A study of Virginia from 1623 to 1637 showed that white 
servants outnumbered white freemen by three to one.  In Maryland at 
one point in the 1600s, the ratio was six to one."  Henry Cromwell, 
the Lord Protector's son, issued an edict that forcibly seizing young 
Irish women and shipping them to the colonies was "so much to their 
owne goode."  Sounds just like liberals, doesn't it?
          "So even though the popular belief is that NO whites were shipped 
to America against their will, it's highly possible that MORE whites 
were bought here unwillingly than blacks."  And sold to the highest 
bidder.  And, like a rental car, abused far more than capital goods, 
like black slaves.  Since, Goad argues, his ancestors were among those 
white slaves, why should he pay reparations to anyone?  Answer me 
that, Bill Clinton?  (Speaking of white trash .... )
          Did I mention the language is filthy?  If you don't like it, tough 
shit. 
(CLICK TO ORDER HARDBACK)
(CLICK TO ORDER PAPERBACK)
Charles Curley lives in Wyoming, which (for you honky liberals) is 
between New York and L.A.  But he isn't a Redneck.