Unreal Estate For Sale
By Tom Creasing 
[email protected]
Exclusive to The Libertarian Enterprise
         I was looking through the Erewhon Times the other morning and 
saw the most amazing coincidence.  Two advertisements, side by side, 
for identical houses, with identical parcels of land, in similar parts 
of the Rocky Mountains.  The price was identical.  There was one big 
difference, though.  One homestead was located in a place called 
Galt's Gulch, U.S.A., while the other was located just outside Greater 
Laporte in the North American Confederacy.
         Which house would you prefer to live in?  
         Which area would you rather call home?
         Despite the fact that both areas represent libertarian/anarchist 
utopias (sadly, "utopia" means "nowhere") they are actually radically 
different concepts and very different visions of how an anarchic 
society should best operate to provide maximum benefits to its 
members.  Your preference between the two, therefore, says something 
about your own personal views on anarchy and its structure.
         Galt's Gulch, you see, is the classic gated community.   
Residence is by invitation only and is reserved for the elite of 
society who've proved themselves through breeding and economic 
success.  Mere proper attitude is not sufficient; the Gulch is filled 
with "natural aristocrats".  The activities there are quiet and 
cultured, though to be fair there is a great deal of industrial hustle 
and bustle as well.  Certainly there is no lack of physical and social 
comfort.  It represents, in its way, the ultimate getaway from the 
problems of statist society, the "cabin in the woods" writ large and 
comfortable.  If you're permitted entrance, then the good life is 
yours to have.  Getting past that gatekeeper, though, can be a 
problem, as the sole measure of "success" seems to be the acquisition 
of wealth.
         Not that there's anything wrong with the acquisition of wealth, 
mind, but it seems that a culture based solely on wealth produces the 
classic Adam Smith "brittle society," one that falls apart at the 
first serious stress.
         Contrast this with the North American Confederacy, which welcomes 
anyone and everyone who agrees to simply abide by its rules.  Living 
and working in the Confederacy are all that are required to be a 
member of that society and to enjoy its benefits.  Having a bank 
account in Laporte is, I've heard, optional.
         The Confederacy, then, represents libertarianism/anarchy at the 
other end of the spectrum from isolationism.  It is a teacher, putting 
on public display all of the good things that happen when statists 
can't lay their tentacles on half to three-quarters to ninety percent 
of everything through taxes and regulation.  It is the human 
imagination and spirits of invention and adventure set free to grow to 
infinity, for these things have no bounds.
         Those who would choose Galt's Gulch are, I would suggest, 
pessimists, believing that the only path to happiness lies in 
concealing themselves from Leviathan's tentacles, of finding a place 
to hide from the oozing slime of statism.  Would-be Confederates, on 
the other hand, are optimists, seeing no boundaries in the future, and 
viewing themselves as people who would prefer to strike the chains 
from their fellows rather than merely dodge those chains themselves.
         So look at your real estate choice and ask yourself, "Am I working 
toward freedom for all, or just wanting to keep it for myself?"  Think 
about what you have done lately to teach, to show, to grow the spirit 
of liberty in a land that needs it so desperately.  Decide whether 
you'd prefer the enclosed safety of the mountains, or the infinity of 
the stars.
         Besides which, I'd take a weekend with Lucy Kropotkin over trying 
to figure out the convolutions of Round-heeled Dagny's thoughts, 
anytime.
Attorney Tom Creasing has just returned to the 'States after a long 
period of working in South Korea.  He now lives in Portland, Oregon.