Response to Attorney Tom Creasing's Comments in The Libertarian Enterprise
 
By Mark Cashman 
[email protected]
Exclusive to The Libertarian Enterprise
         If there's one key component of Objectivism that is confirmed by 
Mr. Creasing's comments, it is that interpretation of ideas outside of 
context is dangerous. 
         Mr. Creasing claims that Ayn Rand's conception of Galt's Gulch [in 
her novel Atlas Shrugged] is elitist and pessimistic and that the 
society of L. Neil Smith's alternate world history [The Probability 
Broach] (in which Rand was once President, by the way), would be 
preferable. 
         However, it is essential to understand the complete nature and 
context of Galt's Gulch. 
         First of all, Atlas Shrugged is a novel of resistance to 
collectivism through the withdrawal of the support of the men of the 
mind.  One of its primary themes is that collectivism is only 
sustained by the efforts of its victims.  Thus, Galt's Gulch, by the 
necessity of the theme and its plot, must be a retreat for these 
productive individuals. 
         Secondly, the only entrance requirement for Galt's Gulch is to 
take (and mean) the Oath*; not, as Mr. Creasing claims, the attainment 
of wealth.  In fact, Dagny meets a truck driver in Galt's Gulch, whose 
response to her query about his greatness in the outside world is "but 
that's not what I wanted to remain", demonstrating Rand's belief that 
Man's ambition to rise and improve is at the heart of the productivity 
that drives the world, and that one's particular status at any given 
time is not a measurement of one's worth. 
         Indeed, supporting the ideas of "status" and "elite" in the sense 
apparently intended by Mr. Creasing, would be a contradiction, since 
it would vitiate her clear opposition to the "second-handers" of The 
Fountainhead, whose desire was only to attain the approval of others 
-- others whom the second-hander perceived as the "elite". 
         Smith's anarchic society, on the other hand, is the sort of 
society which can exist when the ideals of Galt and the inhabitants of 
the Gulch have been attained, but not before.  His novels do not 
address the destruction of the state, the moral code which supports 
the statist ideal (except in the person of the Hamiltonians, whose 
philosophical underpinnings are not examined in detail), or the 
integrated context of philosophical resistance to collectivism. 
         In some ways they must be considered a "utilitarian" elaboration 
of libertarian philosophy, since what one finds in these novels is a 
clear picture of libertarianism leading to greater happiness and 
wealth, but relatively little of the philosophical components on which 
that success depends.  There is definitely more to that success than 
just the Non-Aggression Principle. 
         Like Mr. Creasing, I wouldn't mind a home in Laporte.  But I also 
admire the heroes of Galt's Gulch, and how their unyielding integrity 
and indomitable productivity would make such a world possible -- 
either here, or beyond the Broach.
Mark Cashman, creator of "The Temporal Doorway" at 
http://www.geocities.com/~mcashman -- original digital art, writing, 
and more -- is also the author of science fiction novels available at 
www.infohaus.com/access/by-seller/The_Temporal_Doorway_Storefront/.