Harry Browne Gives Up -- A Little
By Boris Kupershmidt
[email protected]
Special to The Libertarian Enterprise
         The September 8, 1997 issue of Forbes Magazine carries an 
article "Requiem for a Market Letter".  
         Written by Mark Hulbert, who for many years has kept tabs on the 
investment letters industry, it bemoans the recent death of so many of 
them, and goes on to analyze one letter in particular that has been 
discontinued, Harry Browne's Special Reports, continuosly published 
since 1974. 
         Perhaps it is understandable why Hulbert is troubled, for if more of 
these letters were to experience the same catastrophic drop in their 
subscriber base and close up shop, there would be little left for him 
to report on and he would have to find something else to do.  But I 
found it curious that while he concedes that, yes, Browne's portfolio 
produced 3% real return against stocks' 9% over the last decade, he 
goes on to blabber about "comparative volatility" and makes no mention 
of the real issue here.  Browne's subscribers, following his advice, 
will not only have suffered huge losses -- compared to the simplest 
option of leaving their money in an index fund and enjoying 23 years 
of worry-free life -- but have actually been cheated by having 
bought a worthless product at the considerable expense of around $300 
per year.  
         This is obviously only my opinion; here is what it is based upon.
         All of Browne's books are very fat, and each one of them is a 
swindle.  The contents of each could be described simply and 
succinctly in a few pages.  But this conclusion can only be reached 
upon plowing through each whole volume, be it his disquisition on how 
to find "freedom in an unfree world" or how to take advantage of Swiss 
banks. 
         Browne's single investment idea consists of the so-called 
"Permanent Portfolio", divided into four equal parts between stocks, 
bonds, gold, and cash, the basic idea being that no matter what kind 
of trouble is prevalent at the moment, at least one of the four 
components will benefit, even if others are going to the dogs.  The 
wisdom of this idea could be debated, but the point is that he has 
published it in at least one of his books, and there is no further 
reason to continue extracting considerable subscription fees for 
repeating endless variations on the theme. 
         I could make a more substantial criticism of Browne's investment 
philosophy -- if that is the proper word -- by remarking that it takes 
a very special kind of moron to continue following a wholly defensive 
financial strategy while in the world outside unimaginable productive 
capacities are continuously coming on line, due not only to over 50 
years without a major wars (and a concomitant destruction of human 
beings and property), but more specifically to the cumulative power of 
ever-increasing and accelerating human ingenuity, unleashed by the 
growing number of people all over the world able to contribute the 
inventive powers of their brains to the creation of new products 
instead of simply being killed off or forced to live from hand to 
mouth.
         It's not unlikely that Browne's subscribers are a very healthy 
lot, otherwise it would have taken them much less than 23 years to 
wise up to the trash they were getting from their guru.  Indeed, even 
if one lives in an underground bunker and has no other relations with 
the outside world, an occasional visit to a doctor's office would show 
no equipment older than a few years, and that is a fairly good 
reflection on the speed of change and innovation in the world, 
including the worlds of economics and finance.
Boris Kupershmidt, a former citizen of the former Soviet Union, is a 
full time mathematical wizard.  His latest book is being published (if 
all goes smoothly) by the American Mathematical Society.