Some Tactical Reflections
by L. Neil Smith
 [email protected]
Special to The Libertarian Enterprise
    
    [Author's note:  over 35 years as a Libertarian activist and 
    self-defense advocate, I learned nearly every one of the following 
    tidbits the hard way.  Think of them as my gift to you, stocking 
    stuffers, if you will, hanging from the mantlepiece of liberty.]
    
         If you're not a little bit uncomfortable with your position, it 
isn't radical enough.  How can you be too principled?  Take the most 
extreme position you can -- you're claiming territory you won't have 
to fight for later, mostly against your "allies".
         Let the other guy offer compromises.  Think of them as rungs on 
a ladder.  Keep your own goals fixed firmly in your mind and make sure 
you never move any direction but upward.  That's how the other side 
got where they are.  It works.
         Never aim at anything but total achievement of your goal: the 
utter capitulation of the enemy.  Every effort involves inertia and 
mechanical losses, so adopting any lesser objective means partial 
defeat.  Total victory means you don't have to fight the same fight 
again tomorrow.
         Second thoughts, failures of confidence, nervous last-minute 
course-changes are all detours and recipes for defeat.  The time to 
think is before the battle -- if possible, before the war -- not 
in the heat of it.
         The shortest path to victory is a straight line.  He who remains 
most consistent wins.
         Go straight to the heart of the enemy's greatest strength.  
Break that and you break him.  You can always mop up the flanks and 
stragglers later, and they may even surrender, saving you a lot of 
effort.
         Always attack in perpendicular fashion, from an unconventional 
and unexpected (but relevant) direction.  The enemy will be 
unprepared; you can strike him with your full strength while he finds 
nothing to attack effectively.
         Remain the judge of your own actions.  Never surrender that 
position by default.  When the enemy screams "Foul!" the loudest, you 
know you're doing him the most damage.  Those who help him scream 
are also the enemy.
         If you can avoid it, never play on the other guy's field, by the 
other guy's rules, or with the other guy's ball.  He didn't design 
his system to give you the advantage.  Remember that organisms 
defending their own territory are twice as effective as an intruding 
attacker.
         You may never convince the other guy, but it's often worthwhile to 
keep arguing for the effect it has on bystanders, especially his 
allies.
         Well-timed silence is an effective bargainer.  Most people fear 
silence at a level below conscious analysis, and rush to fill the 
emptiness with accommodation.  A difficult tactic to learn and use, 
but it works.
         The more fundamental position is the highest ground, allowing the 
most "perpendicular" attack.  If he argues politics, argue ethics -- 
things seldom go beyond this stage.  If he argues ethics, argue 
epistemology (look it up).  If he argues epistemology, argue 
metaphysics.  If he argues metaphysics, you're up against Darth Vader 
and you're in trouble.  Switch back to politics and accuse him of 
being out of touch with everyday reality.  Or ask him if he's stopped 
beating his wife.
         Conservatives are accustomed to being called fascists and are well 
prepared to defend themselves on that ground.  Liberals are used to 
being called socialists.  Those labels can be switched, however, and 
remain valid and instructive.  It also catches them completely 
unprepared.
         Understand from the minute the fight begins that you're going to 
take damage.  Accept it.  (You'll always suffer more from the idiots 
and cowards on your own side than from any enemy.)  Keep your 
overall goal in mind above all.  Those who swerve to avoid a few cuts 
and bruises defeat themselves.
         If you lose, go down fighting.  It costs nothing extra, and now 
and again ...
         Know down to the last cell in your body that the other guy 
started it.  He's the one who put things in an ethical context where 
considerations like decency and mercy have no referent. The less pity 
moves you now, the sooner you can go back to being a nice guy.
         Otherhandwise, the easiest, most humiliating path to defeat is 
thinking that to beat the enemy you must be like him.  Avoid the 
temptation to set your values aside "for the duration".  What's the 
point of fighting if you give up what you're fighting for?  If 
remaining consistent with your values leads to defeat, you chose the 
wrong values to begin with.
         Truth is a valuable commodity which you don't automatically owe to 
anyone.  Remember, however, that lies are even more expensive -- 
they're tiring and costly to maintain -- and even a tiny one can 
utterly destroy you.
         Never soft-pedal the truth.  It's seldom self-evident and almost 
never sells itself, because there's less sales resistance to a glib 
and comforting lie.
         Lies can be custom-tailored; truth comes straight off the rack -- 
one size fits all.  (This gem by my wife, Cathy L.Z. Smith.)
         Those who lead through authority have rivals on whom they must 
expend as much energy and attention as they do on their enemies. Those 
who lead by example have enemies, but no rivals.
Novelist and political essayist  L. Neil Smith is the only libertarian 
ever to be called a  "thug" within the pages of the Libertarian Party 
News, as well as an  "uptight, repressed, gun-worshiping lunatic"  by 
another admirer.  He's also been characterized by a disgruntled reader 
as having written  the "single most repugnant piece of tripe ever seen 
in an American newspaper."   In his spare time, he's the award-winning 
author of  The Probability Broach, Pallas, Henry Martyn,  and 
Bretta Martyn.   Order all of his novels from Amazon.com through his 
"The Webley Page" at http://www.lneilsmith.org//lnsbooks.html, or give 
Laissez Faire Books a toll free telephone call at 1-800-326-0996.